Warena (RENA) Investment Calculator
Warena Investment Calculator
Current Market Status
Current Price: $0.001
Market Cap: $126k (CoinGecko) / $350k (CoinMarketCap)
24-hour Volume: $23k
Investment Results
Enter an investment amount to see potential returns.
When you hear the name Warena (RENA) is a blockchain‑based NFT gaming token built on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC), you probably wonder if it’s still worth a look. In plain terms, Warena tries to blend a play‑to‑earn strategy game with metaverse ideas, letting players earn a token while battling zombies and later exploring other realms. Warena crypto has been in the news because its price fell more than 99% since the 2021 IDO, but the token still shows up on most price trackers and can be moved between wallets. This guide breaks down what the coin actually does, how it got here, and whether there’s any reason to keep an eye on it.
Key Takeaways
- Warena (RENA) launched on the BNB Chain in 2021 with a $0.165 IDO price.
- Total supply is 100million, 95million are circulating as of Oct2025.
- Current price sits around $0.001, a 99% loss from the launch price.
- Development has stalled; only the first “Survival Phase” game is live.
- Liquidity is thin (≈$23k 24‑hour volume) and community activity is minimal.
What is Warena (RENA)?
Warena is marketed as a play‑to‑earn gaming model where players earn cryptocurrency by playing and collecting in‑game NFTs. The token follows the BEP‑20 standard on the BNB Chain formerly Binance Smart Chain, a low‑fee, fast blockchain for DeFi and GameFi projects. Players use RENA to buy upgrades, level up robots, and eventually explore a metaverse that the team promised for 2022. The core idea was to let the token power both the economy of the game and the ownership of unique NFTs that could move across metaverse platforms.
How does the token work?
The smart contract address for RENA is 0xa9d75cc3405f0450955050c520843f99aff8749d. It implements the standard BEP‑20 functions (transfer, approve, balanceOf) so it works with any BNB‑compatible wallet like MetaMask or Trust Wallet. The tokenomics were simple on paper:
- Total supply: 100million RENA.
- Public sale allocation: 1.8million tokens (1.8% of total).
- Team & ecosystem reserves: the remaining 98.2% locked in various vesting schedules.
- No built‑in buy‑back or burn mechanism.
Because the public‑sale share was so tiny, early investors held a disproportionate amount of the circulating supply. When the vesting periods began, a flood of tokens hit the market, putting downward pressure on price. The token also lacks any staking or yield‑farm feature to keep holders incentivized beyond the game itself.
Price history and current market data
Warena’s IDO ran from 3-7Oct2021 at $0.165 per RENA, raising about $1.8million. The token briefly spiked to an all‑time high of $6.63 in early 2022, giving early buyers a 40‑fold return. Since then, the price has trended sharply downward. As of 12Oct2025 the price range is $0.0009-$0.0016, putting the market cap at roughly $126k (CoinGecko) and $350k (CoinMarketCap). The fully‑diluted valuation (FDV) is now under $150k, a far cry from the $16.5M FDV at launch.
Trading volume is thin - about $23k in the last 24hours - which means moving a large amount will shift price quickly. Technical indicators show a bearish medium‑term trend: the 50‑day SMA ($0.000807) and 200‑day SMA ($0.000787) sit above the spot price, while the 14‑day RSI is neutral at 56.7. The token’s volatility over the past month was 3.95%, slightly higher than many BNB‑Chain coins but still modest because of low liquidity.
Roadmap and development status
The original roadmap promised two major phases:
- Survival Phase - a 2D tower‑defense game released Q42021.
- Metaverse Phase - a multi‑dimensional world slated for Q22022.
Only the first phase launched. The metaverse upgrade, V2 features, and AR integrations never materialized, and there has been no official update since late 2022. The lack of new content means player retention has dropped sharply, which directly hurts token demand. Without fresh gameplay, the promise of cross‑metaverse NFT compatibility remains just a marketing line.
Competitive landscape
Warena entered a crowded field of GameFi projects that also use the BNB Chain. To see how it stacks up, here’s a quick comparison with two more established titles.
| Metric | Warena (RENA) | Axie Infinity | The Sandbox |
|---|---|---|---|
| Launch Year | 2021 | 2018 | 2020 |
| Total Supply | 100M RENA | 270M AXS | 1B SAND |
| Current Price (Oct2025) | $0.001 | $0.45 | $0.62 |
| 24‑h Volume | $23k | $540M | $210M |
| Active Users (monthly) | ~2k | ~6M | ~1.8M |
| ROI Since IDO | -99% | +1500% | +800% |
The numbers make it clear why Warena has slipped into the shadows. Its user base and liquidity are a fraction of the larger projects, and the token price barely covers transaction fees.
Risks and why the token has crashed
Several factors explain the steep decline:
- Tokenomics imbalance: Only 1.8% was sold to the public, leaving a massive supply locked for the team. When those tokens unlocked, sellers flooded the market.
- Missing roadmap milestones: The promised metaverse never arrived, so the utility of RENA stayed limited to a single, aging game.
- Liquidity shortage: Daily volume under $25k means any sizeable trade moves the price dramatically, discouraging new investors.
- Community decay: Social channels show almost no activity, and there are few active Discord or Reddit threads discussing gameplay or token strategy.
- Competitive pressure: Bigger GameFi titles continue to add features, attract developers, and keep players engaged, leaving little room for Warena to regain relevance.
Because the token’s fundamentals have weakened, most analysts now label Warena as a high‑risk, likely unrecoverable asset.
Is Warena worth buying now?
If you’re looking for a speculative bargain, the ultra‑low price might seem tempting. However, consider these points before you spend a dime:
- Liquidity is too thin for any meaningful position - you could be stuck with tokens you can’t sell.
- There’s no clear development roadmap or a team update indicating new product releases.
- Competing GameFi projects offer far larger communities and proven token utility.
- The only realistic upside would be a sudden revival of the game or a buy‑back by the team, both of which have low probability.
For most investors, the safer choice is to stay clear of RENA and focus on projects with active development, solid liquidity, and transparent token economics.
How to store and trade Warena
Moving RENA around is straightforward because it follows the BEP‑20 standard. Here’s a quick run‑through:
- Open a BNB‑compatible wallet (MetaMask, Trust Wallet, Binance Chain Wallet).
- Add a custom token using the contract address
0xa9d75cc3405f0450955050c520843f99aff8749d. The wallet will auto‑fill the token symbol (RENA) and decimals (18). - To buy or sell, use a BNB‑Chain DEX such as PancakeSwap. Swap BNB for RENA (or vice‑versa) by entering the token address.
- Always double‑check the contract address - scams often copy the token name but use a different address.
Because of low volume, you may need to split orders into smaller chunks and accept a higher slippage percentage.
Frequently Asked Questions
What platform does Warena run on?
Warena is built on the BNB Chain, which was formerly known as Binance Smart Chain. This lets the token benefit from low fees and fast confirmations.
Is the Warena game still active?
Only the first "Survival Phase" tower‑defense game is live. The promised metaverse expansion has not been released, and there have been no official updates since 2022.
Can I earn RENA by playing?
During the Survival Phase, players earn in‑game glass spheres that can be exchanged for RENA, but the payout rates are very low compared to the token’s current market price.
What’s the biggest risk of buying RENA now?
The biggest risk is liquidity. With daily trading volume under $25k, even a modest sell order can push the price down sharply, making it hard to exit a position.
How does Warena compare to Axie Infinity?
Axie Infinity has a far larger user base, active marketplace, and higher liquidity. Warena’s token price is a fraction of Axie’s, but its utility and community are also far smaller, leading to a much riskier investment profile.
Looks like a classic GameFi ghost town.
The write‑up nails the brutal reality of Warena – a token that promised a metaverse but delivered barely a demo. It’s almost poetic how the hype collapsed into a $0.001 price tag, and the numbers don’t lie. Still, the article keeps the tone balanced, which I appreciate.
Yo, this is the kind of GameFi case study that makes you question every "play‑to‑earn" hype 🚀. The tokenomics are a textbook example of supply shock and low liquidity, and the ROI story is straight up tragic. If you’re hunting for a speculative pump, this is a red flag city. 😅
From a philosophical angle, Warena illustrates how promised utility can evaporate when development stalls. The community’s decay mirrors a larger lesson: without continuous engagement, even the most innovative concepts fade. Keep your eyes on projects that evolve, not just on hype.
Hey folks, just a friendly reminder: low volume means you might get stuck with tokens you can’t unload. If you’re looking for a fun experiment, maybe allocate pennies, but treat it as a gamble, not a portfolio builder.
Simple truth – the game isn’t active, the token isn’t liquid, and the community is quiet. That’s a three‑point checklist for staying away.
Formally speaking, the market data presented validates the token’s under‑performance. Casually, it’s a reminder that hype without substance leads to inevitable decline.
Imagine a world where Warena actually launched its promised metaverse – that would be a rainbow of opportunity. Sadly, we’re stuck with a grayscale token that barely moves.
Fact: 98% of supply is locked for the team, and when it unlocks it floods the market. Also, the low volume makes any manipulation easy. Trust no one.
Another lazy post about a dead coin. Nothing new here, just same old story of hype → dump.
If you still want to dabble, split your orders into tiny chunks and set a high slippage tolerance. That’s the only practical way to navigate the thin order book.
Typical toxic analysis – just another warning about a worthless token.
Ah, the usual elite lament about “failed projects”. Yet here we are, seeing the same pattern repeat. Contrarian? Not really, just observing reality.
Let’s talk jargon: the token suffers from a liquidity crunch, anemic user base, and a broken roadmap. Bottom line – it’s a sinking ship.
Okay, let’s unpack this whole Warena saga because it’s a perfect case study of what not to do in GameFi. First, the tokenomics were heavily skewed – the public sale got a minuscule slice while the team held the massive majority, setting the stage for future dumping. Second, the promised roadmap was basically a billboard of empty promises; only the “Survival Phase” ever saw the light of day, and the much‑hyped metaverse never materialized. Third, the community engagement metrics are abysmal – think a few thousand active users versus millions on competing platforms, which translates directly into negligible liquidity. Fourth, the price history tells a story of a spectacular rise to $6.63 followed by an almost complete annihilation to $0.001 – a 99% loss that would make most investors run for the hills. Fifth, because of the thin trading volume (roughly $23k per day), any sizable order can swing the price dramatically, making exits practically impossible without taking a huge loss. Sixth, the lack of any staking or yield mechanisms means there’s no intrinsic reason to hold the token beyond speculative gambling. Seventh, the token’s BEP‑20 implementation is standard, so moving it isn’t a technical hurdle, but that’s the only bright spot. Eighth, the market data showed bearish SMA indicators and a neutral RSI, confirming the downtrend. Ninth, the comparison table with Axie Infinity and The Sandbox highlights the massive gap in user base, volume, and price performance. Tenth, the risk factors – tokenomics imbalance, missing roadmap, liquidity shortage, community decay, and competitive pressure – are all ticking time‑bombs. Eleventh, the article correctly advises most investors to steer clear, unless you’re a high‑risk gambler seeking a potential pump. Twelfth, even if the team were to execute a buy‑back, the odds are slim given their silence since 2022. Thirteenth, you might argue that any cheap token could be a diamond in the rough, but without a solid development plan or community, that’s wishful thinking. Fourteenth, the only realistic upside would be a sudden revamp of the game or an acquisition, both of which are unlikely. Fifteenth, in the grand scheme, Warena serves as a cautionary tale about overpromising and underdelivering in the fast‑moving GameFi space. Finally, if you’re looking for sustainable GameFi investments, focus on projects with active development, transparent tokenomics, and robust liquidity.
Whoa, you just listed a laundry list of doom – but where’s any constructive suggestion? If the team wants to revive RENA, they need to drop a real update, not just a vague promise. Also, pumping the token now would be outright manipulation and could get them in trouble.
Sure, because yelling about "constructive suggestions" after dumping a dozen sentences of negativity is totally helpful. Maybe next time just keep it short and to the point, yeah?